Skip to main content

Thuppakki and our over-the-counter Army chiefs, freedom fighters


Field Marshall in the making?

Its release was preceded by controversies — two, to be precise — that generated ample heat, with sections objecting to the seemingly inaccurate portrayal of a community and its lead actor’s supposed preference for cheroots, culminating in a slew of apologies from its makers. Going by the posters commemorating its 50-day run at the BO, Thuppakki could court another controversy, forcing its makers to do an encore.

Some thumbnail images accompanied ‘Ilayathalapathy’ Vijay in the movie’s posters that surfaced in Chennai on the occasion; a closer look revealed them to be, along with our current Defence chiefs, the select Armed Forces chiefs, who, during our nation’s moments of distress, helmed our forces and ensured that we emerged unscathed and victorious — our Field Marshals. The impression the poster seemed to generate was that actor Vijay was on his way to being decorated as the nation’s next Field Marshal, pitching him along the likes of Gen Sam Manekshaw and Gen Arjan Singh!

A Defence chief in an over-the-counter purchase? You bet, and put aside the Tatra truck deal out of your mind, will you?
To the uninitiated, Thuppakki, a humongous box-office success, has Vijay playing an Army Commander, who during a visit to Mumbai, serendipitously uncovers terrorist sleeper cell activities and its links to organisations in Kashmir and serial bomb blasts, while defusing threats all along, single-handedly; his mission punctuated at regular intervals by a romantic interlude.

Here’s why the poster is a big blunder and an affront to the nation.
1.   While Messrs A R Murugadoss, Kalaipuli Thanu and Co may be commended for making a film on our Armymen (a declaration at the movie's end makes it clear), this does not warrant them to use our decorated Army chiefs for their vested interests (Are they even aware of it, in the first place?). Thuppakki, after all, is a masala flick and certainly is no documentary on our soldiers, and has been made with the singular intention of making money for its producers. Hence, this marketing move of sorts smacks of utter indifference and insolence
2.   This could also be interpreted as emotional manipulation at its crass worst. It's as if these personnel have already watched the movie and want us to follow suit — very much like an advertorial masquerading as a news article without any disclaimer. Army men, like doctors and nurses, largely lead lives of service — and I’m not talking about corruption scandals — hence, the perception of regard surrounding them. The poster is, thus, very much like the TV ad where models in medical suits urge us to purchase that toothpaste or insect repellent
3.   The probability that this poster can spark off a trend is very high, given that Vijay is among the sale-able of Tamil actors. Endless, of course, are the avenues for such ignominious possibilities. We already have a ‘Captain’ (Vijaykanth) who has nixed all our security threats, from Kashmir to Kanyakumari. What next?
4.   Laughable as it may seem, an accompanying caption in the poster reads “Victory to the Indian Armed Forces”. Really, Mr Thanu? Will you go to any extent just to redeem your investment?

Attestation from our freedom fighters!

Going a step ahead was an advertisement that appeared in some of the regional newspapers, in which Vijay shares space with our freedom fighters — from Netaji Subash Chandra Bose to Bal Gangadhar Tilak and Subramanya Bharati. A caption reads thus: "Terrorism? That too in our nation, which was won with our sweat and blood? Long live the Thalapathy."

Hyperbole, did someone say?


Jai Hind!

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Why the editorial is the unsung hero of any newspaper

A tad autobiographical, this account encapsulates my experiences at a news organisation. Why wait until 50 or 60 to compose one? Hell, who knows, this could even be its blueprint! So, here goes my first stab at chronicling myself... I was prepared for all kinds of weird questions for my first job interview as a journalist four years ago, for the post of a sub-editor, but I never anticipated this one that caught me off guard. Noting that I preferred to work in the editorial than the reporting section, a HR representative at the organization asked in almost an air of dismissal, implying that the editorial is something redundant, “After all, we have Microsoft Word, in built with grammar and spell check capabilities, so why must I hire you?” I stared at him blankly for a moment as a smile grew on his face, perhaps out of exult at having stumped me. I trotted a familiar refrain, which I am sure he would have encountered countless times, “Because I am passionate about writing a...

Is what you are watching actually a cartoon?

Disclaimer: What you are about to read may seem weird, but what the hell, I am hypothesising it to be true, so who knows... Cartoons are basica lly meant for kids. The main reason e lders prefer letting the kids watch them without their sup ervision is that they need not fret over the incidence of X-rated content in it – namely content that concerns that famous three-letter word or violence. I suggest that we re-examine this mindset of ours (as someone who has grown up watching the very cartoons that I am about to damn, I have mixed feelings as I type this. Consider the following list: Tom and Jerry , Bugs Bunny and El mer Fudd/Yosemite Sam , Tweety and Sylvester and Coyote a nd Road R unner . These are cartoons which we would definitel y not squirm about before letting a toddler/child watch it. These cartoons are hilarious, have palatable themes; have caricatures that look cute (I am yet to come across a girl who hates Tweety). Tom and Jerry, for instance, was once even vot...

Tamil Nadu’s Thala-Thalapathy conundrum

Overrated, yet celebrated:  Tamil actors Vijay and Ajith, who command massive fan-followings “Oh, you watch Tamil cinema? So, you must be a fan of  Thala /  Thalapathy ?” Trepidation must be the watchword when one encounters these statements. For, this refers to a syndrome that has divided film freaks of Tamil Nadu into fans of Kollywood’s leading (well, at least expensive) actors —  Thala  or Ajith Kumar and  Thalapathy  or Vijay. Chances are, the manner in which you will be treated from then on depends on your reply. Behold the Thala-Thalapathy syndrome. Such is its omnipresence that no Tamilian worth his salt can ever claim to have escaped it ( Thala  and  Thalapathy  roughly translate to “leader” and “commander”, in Tamil). Industry buzz has it that Vijay’s moniker lends credence to the theory that he is the “successor” to Rajinikanth’s mantle in the industry ( Thalapathy  was one of Rajini’s biggest ...