Skip to main content

A placebo entertainer

Published in City Express, the daily supplement of The New Indian Express, Bangalore on April 16, 2012

A rehash of the director’s earlier hits, Oru kal ou kannadi bears no novelty and entertains, albeit partly

And we thought recycling allegorically referred to only leftover-dependant lazy cooks or music composers with little care for copyright issues. Joining the bandwagon is director Rajesh with Oru kal oru kannadi (a stone, a looking glass), which reprises – and ends in a reprisal of – his earlier hits Siva Manasula Sakthi and Boss Engira Baskaran. 

An etymology analysis would reveal that the kal and kannadi of the movie’s title – probably inspired by a song of the same name from Siva Manasula Sakthi – refer to the sexes from Mars and Venus respectively; one needs no nuclear scientist to infer that this is a love caper.

OKOK opens to Saravana (Udhayanidhi Stalin, grandson of DMK patriarch M Karunanidhi) and his friend Partha (Santhanam) setting out to Pondicherry to kidnap a woman from a marriage hall. In a flashback we are led through a love plot between Saravana and Meera (Hansika Motwani). Its love at first sight for Saravana following his serendipitous encounter with her at a traffic junction; he falls for her fair-skinned and plump looks – yes, you read it right (can’t we have a course correction on notions of beauty?).

From then on, it’s all about Saravana attempting to woo her, punctuated by comic interludes with his friend Partha (Santhanam), who in addition to helping Saravana has a love to pursue of his own.

One feels that the lead pair could have done with a good dose of chemistry. Sequences such as the relation between Saravana and his mother and Saravana and Partha have many parallels with the director’s earlier ventures. Santhanam – donning the role of almost a second hero, a la Koundamani – brings the roof down with his constant one-liners. He virtually shoulders the movie and makes it for easy viewing.

What could have been one of OKOK’s pluses, and was in the director’s earlier ventures, becomes an irritant thanks to incessant repetition. Dialogues that tend to get serious end in hilarity – not wrong, as long as it is not overdone to the extent of the viewer predicting its outcome a mile before.

The songs save for Venam machan... and Kaadhal oru butterfly... lack freshness and are eerily reminiscent of Harris Jayaraj’s earlier hits. Was he woken up in the dead of the night and asked to compose them?

by Rajagopalan Venkataraman

Labels

Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Is what you are watching actually a cartoon?

Disclaimer: What you are about to read may seem weird, but what the hell, I am hypothesising it to be true, so who knows... Cartoons are basica lly meant for kids. The main reason e lders prefer letting the kids watch them without their sup ervision is that they need not fret over the incidence of X-rated content in it – namely content that concerns that famous three-letter word or violence. I suggest that we re-examine this mindset of ours (as someone who has grown up watching the very cartoons that I am about to damn, I have mixed feelings as I type this. Consider the following list: Tom and Jerry , Bugs Bunny and El mer Fudd/Yosemite Sam , Tweety and Sylvester and Coyote a nd Road R unner . These are cartoons which we would definitel y not squirm about before letting a toddler/child watch it. These cartoons are hilarious, have palatable themes; have caricatures that look cute (I am yet to come across a girl who hates Tweety). Tom and Jerry, for instance, was once even vot...
2 comments
Read more

Why the editorial is the unsung hero of any newspaper

A tad autobiographical, this account encapsulates my experiences at a news organisation. Why wait until 50 or 60 to compose one? Hell, who knows, this could even be its blueprint! So, here goes my first stab at chronicling myself... I was prepared for all kinds of weird questions for my first job interview as a journalist four years ago, for the post of a sub-editor, but I never anticipated this one that caught me off guard. Noting that I preferred to work in the editorial than the reporting section, a HR representative at the organization asked in almost an air of dismissal, implying that the editorial is something redundant, “After all, we have Microsoft Word, in built with grammar and spell check capabilities, so why must I hire you?” I stared at him blankly for a moment as a smile grew on his face, perhaps out of exult at having stumped me. I trotted a familiar refrain, which I am sure he would have encountered countless times, “Because I am passionate about writing a...
6 comments
Read more

Is Thuglak’s Editor Going the Thuglak Way?

The front-page cartoons of this magazine have always been considered a barometer of the nation, and particularly Tamil Nadu’s, political landscape. Rib-tickling and dripping with sarcasm, it’s following has gradually swelled, though, not in dramatic terms, as certain high-profile media houses would flaunt. Be it the DMK or the AIADMK, the BJP or Congress, the Left or National Conference, its leaders have been the butt of many an acerbic but thought-provoking joke. In fact, it may not sound out of context to liken this publication to the American humour magazine, MAD. Sample this: during the height of Anna Hazare’s high-profile fast against corruption, resulting in hectic parleys between his team of lieutenants and the Parliament, this magazine ran a front page cartoon with Team-A on one side and representatives of the UPA government on the other. Team-A, which remains silent when its demands such as inclusion of the Judiciary and prime minister under the Lokpal Bill’s ambit are met...
6 comments
Read more