Skip to main content

India and Its Raymond Davises

At first sight, the killing of two Indian fishermen by Italian marines off the coast of Kerala and the murder of three Pakistanis by an American government official exactly about a year ago seem to be starkly different.


However, scratch the surface and the similarities can be startling:

  • There was an absolute denial of wrongdoing on the part of the accused (for obvious reasons) – the American, Raymond Davis, which it would be revealed later that he was a covert CIA agent, claimed that he fired in self-defence; the Italian marines, too, made a similar claim, despite others aboard the fishing trawler asserting that they weren’t in possession of arms. Note that Indian fishermen are not allowed by law to carry arms.

  • Davis and the marines, despite their “innocence”, were incarcerated swiftly. Their respective homelands, the USA and Italy respectively, swung into action, demanding their immediate release citing international human rights and UN conventions – wonder what happened to them when the incidents occurred. The US (and the NATO) threatened Pakistan of dire consequences; hyperbole of a healthy bilateral relationship going sour abounded the Pentagon’s media rooms. Italian officials of various hues and ranks have landed in Indian shores, not to mention the opening of dedicated diplomatic channels, to extricate the two sailors.

  • Repulsive as this statement may seem, politics has had a role to play in both the incidents: following Davis’ lodging in the Kot Lakhpat jail in Lahore, the Pakistani government virtually cut off all communication with its ‘ally’ against terror, the US. The ISI, the power bearer sans responsibility, was content at playing second-fiddle throughout, leaving the corruption-besieged PPP government to field inconvenient questions about its next action against Davis. Already in India, the UPA-led government at the Centre has indicated that the issue would be left to its Kerala counterpart, when it ought to be at the forefront.

  • And then there has been the curious case of a newly consecrated Kerala Cardinal making a slew of unfortunate statements, among his notable gaffes of utterances (or was it malice?) being he will “ask the government not to act in haste”, “the primary opposition party in Kerala (the CPM) would derive mileage out of the incident” and “errors were made as fishermen were mistaken for pirates”. The icing on this ignominious cake came from his reported statements that his heart went out to the Catholic fishermen who died and that he would pursue the issue with Catholic ministers of the Kerala Cabinet. Probably his heart would not have melted had the fishermen belonged to another religion, or maybe, Christian sect?
    If ever Italy was looking for someone to advocate their cause, it must verily be him.
    True, the Cardinal may have disowned the statements; the media house may have issued an apology  — but the damage was already done.

  • In Pakistan, the wife of one of Davis’ victims committed suicide, worried that she may not be provided adequate compensation. In an alarming corollary, the wife of one of the Indian fisherman has petitioned a court stating that she needs a compensation of Rs one crore and that she will not be able to foot the litigation expenses.

  • The Pakistani government had to do a balancing act between appeasing public sentiment and complying with the US, albeit grudgingly. Davis was eventually released, but not before ‘blood money’ was provided to the kin of the deceased. Of course it had the leverage of access to its hinterland to Afghanistan which it could use as a pawn against the US. Italy is no US and we do not need any leverage to assert our authority against foreigners committing crimes on Indian soil or waters.

  • This brings us to a vital aspect of our international diplomacy. Politeness is our forte; we abide by the dictum ‘athithi devo bhava’, but we must also have the gumption to assert that others’ nose ends where ours begin. Our track record in this regard isn’t too inspiring. For instance, during 26/11, we let Mossad and FBI agents walk all over our crime spots; the US is still debating whether it needs to extradite David Headley to India, whose involvement in a host of terror activities has been conclusively proved. Portugal has flatly refused to extradite Abu Salem. However, by accommodating the Italians in the investigation into the incident, we are not covering ourselves with glory.
We can make a beginning by awarding the right punishment to the reckless sailors. Italy can choose to bar olive oil and pasta export to our country.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Why the editorial is the unsung hero of any newspaper

A tad autobiographical, this account encapsulates my experiences at a news organisation. Why wait until 50 or 60 to compose one? Hell, who knows, this could even be its blueprint! So, here goes my first stab at chronicling myself... I was prepared for all kinds of weird questions for my first job interview as a journalist four years ago, for the post of a sub-editor, but I never anticipated this one that caught me off guard. Noting that I preferred to work in the editorial than the reporting section, a HR representative at the organization asked in almost an air of dismissal, implying that the editorial is something redundant, “After all, we have Microsoft Word, in built with grammar and spell check capabilities, so why must I hire you?” I stared at him blankly for a moment as a smile grew on his face, perhaps out of exult at having stumped me. I trotted a familiar refrain, which I am sure he would have encountered countless times, “Because I am passionate about writing a...

Is what you are watching actually a cartoon?

Disclaimer: What you are about to read may seem weird, but what the hell, I am hypothesising it to be true, so who knows... Cartoons are basica lly meant for kids. The main reason e lders prefer letting the kids watch them without their sup ervision is that they need not fret over the incidence of X-rated content in it – namely content that concerns that famous three-letter word or violence. I suggest that we re-examine this mindset of ours (as someone who has grown up watching the very cartoons that I am about to damn, I have mixed feelings as I type this. Consider the following list: Tom and Jerry , Bugs Bunny and El mer Fudd/Yosemite Sam , Tweety and Sylvester and Coyote a nd Road R unner . These are cartoons which we would definitel y not squirm about before letting a toddler/child watch it. These cartoons are hilarious, have palatable themes; have caricatures that look cute (I am yet to come across a girl who hates Tweety). Tom and Jerry, for instance, was once even vot...

Tamil Nadu’s Thala-Thalapathy conundrum

Overrated, yet celebrated:  Tamil actors Vijay and Ajith, who command massive fan-followings “Oh, you watch Tamil cinema? So, you must be a fan of  Thala /  Thalapathy ?” Trepidation must be the watchword when one encounters these statements. For, this refers to a syndrome that has divided film freaks of Tamil Nadu into fans of Kollywood’s leading (well, at least expensive) actors —  Thala  or Ajith Kumar and  Thalapathy  or Vijay. Chances are, the manner in which you will be treated from then on depends on your reply. Behold the Thala-Thalapathy syndrome. Such is its omnipresence that no Tamilian worth his salt can ever claim to have escaped it ( Thala  and  Thalapathy  roughly translate to “leader” and “commander”, in Tamil). Industry buzz has it that Vijay’s moniker lends credence to the theory that he is the “successor” to Rajinikanth’s mantle in the industry ( Thalapathy  was one of Rajini’s biggest ...