Skip to main content

Vedi: Formulaic and repetitive

Appeared in City Express, the daily supplement of The New Indian Express, on October 3, 2011

“You, a Tamilian, eh? What makes you people a daring race?” a goon questions the hero. In reply, the hero, Vishal, slam-dunks a glass bottle through his adversary’s mouth that pierces through the back of his head, leaving his henchmen too stunned to react. Vedi (U/A), a remake of the Telugu film Shouryam, comprises similar scenes and a plot that has been done to death by Kollywood’s honchos.
Vedi (the cracker) has Vishal essaying the role of Prabhakaran, an IPS officer in search of his long-lost sibling, who also has to overcome his nemesis (Sayaji Shinde) along the way. He joins as a physical education trainer at a college in Kolkata, where he comes in contact with Balu (Vivek), a gym instructor, whose desperation to obtain a muscular figure forces him to nestle balloons inside his shirt. 
Paro (Sameera Reddy), a student in the same college, gets smitten by Prabhakaran. However, beneath Prabhakaran’s placid exterior is a monster waiting to erupt.
If there were ever a factor that hurts Vedi the most, it is its refusal to maintain its suspense. Paro bumps into Prabhakaran in a road, raising hopes that they will meet again soon. And presto, the very next scene has Prabhakaran in her college. Deepa (Poonam Kaur), Paro’s classmate, is a source of help to Prabhakaran; lest it does not act as a spoiler, the audience gets a mountain of a hint that something else awaits the two. Meanwhile, Eshwaramoorthy (Sayaji Shinde), a local don, seeks vengeance against the person who had jailed him. The first half proceeds sans too many glitches, but the latter half runs itself into a rut, what with the director’s fetish for detail in the form of a never-ending stream of flashbacks.
The script alternates between Thoothukudi, where the villain is holed up, and Kolkata, with its iconic landmarks, the trams, the Writer's Building and the Howrah Bridge. Vishal, after an offbeat role in Avan Ivan, returns to playing characters tailor-made for him, flaunting his sinewy looks. Sameera Reddy provides the necessary eye-candy. And was that Devi Sri Prasad in the opening song? Sophie Chaudhary makes a fleeting appearance in an item number. Vivek spoofs Apoorva Sagodharargal, Endhiran, Malayoor Mambattiyan and a host of other movies in his comedy track.
The fights may be modern; replete with freeze-frame techniques and The Matrix-like stunts, but the storyline is definitely Stone Age stuff. This cracker fails to light even its fuse.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Nanban: Rancho speaks in Tamil, and how!

Bollywood fare, served with Tamil niceties When the recipes of Gobi Manchurian and Chicken Tikka can transcend national barriers and become a rage elsewhere, can’t we have different versions of an intra-national rage: a remake of a successful Bollywood movie in another language, for instance? Director Shankar answers the question with Nanban (friend), a faithful reproduction, nay a spitting image, of its original, the Aamir Khan-starrer 3 idiots , comprising its highs and lows with equal measure. The hero and the anti-heroes The flaws in our higher education system, especially engineering, and campus life unite to form a heady theme, with Vijay, reprising Aamir Khan’s cool dude-cum-Buddha-like role in the original, offering ingenuous solutions to many a conundrum. Did he levitate on screen? I don’t know; however, I am not willing to bet against it. Jeeva and Srikanth (after a hiatus), portraying Sharman Joshi and Madhavan’s roles in the original respectively, are hi

Why the editorial is the unsung hero of any newspaper

A tad autobiographical, this account encapsulates my experiences at a news organisation. Why wait until 50 or 60 to compose one? Hell, who knows, this could even be its blueprint! So, here goes my first stab at chronicling myself... I was prepared for all kinds of weird questions for my first job interview as a journalist four years ago, for the post of a sub-editor, but I never anticipated this one that caught me off guard. Noting that I preferred to work in the editorial than the reporting section, a HR representative at the organization asked in almost an air of dismissal, implying that the editorial is something redundant, “After all, we have Microsoft Word, in built with grammar and spell check capabilities, so why must I hire you?” I stared at him blankly for a moment as a smile grew on his face, perhaps out of exult at having stumped me. I trotted a familiar refrain, which I am sure he would have encountered countless times, “Because I am passionate about writing a

Tamil Nadu’s Thala-Thalapathy conundrum

Overrated, yet celebrated:  Tamil actors Vijay and Ajith, who command massive fan-followings “Oh, you watch Tamil cinema? So, you must be a fan of  Thala /  Thalapathy ?” Trepidation must be the watchword when one encounters these statements. For, this refers to a syndrome that has divided film freaks of Tamil Nadu into fans of Kollywood’s leading (well, at least expensive) actors —  Thala  or Ajith Kumar and  Thalapathy  or Vijay. Chances are, the manner in which you will be treated from then on depends on your reply. Behold the Thala-Thalapathy syndrome. Such is its omnipresence that no Tamilian worth his salt can ever claim to have escaped it ( Thala  and  Thalapathy  roughly translate to “leader” and “commander”, in Tamil). Industry buzz has it that Vijay’s moniker lends credence to the theory that he is the “successor” to Rajinikanth’s mantle in the industry ( Thalapathy  was one of Rajini’s biggest hits); Ajith’s nickname is to establish that he is a leader