Skip to main content

Rancho certainly didn’t get his basics right

A scene in the recent Bollywood blockbuster, three idiots, goes as follows: The principal of the college explains to an eager bunch of freshers how the Americans spent years of complex research and millions of dollars in developing a pen that can be used in a spacecraft, even in zero and sub gravity conditions and in extremes of temperatures. At that instant, Rancho (the character portrayed by Aamir Khan), almost innocently asks, “Sir, can’t we use a pencil instead?” when all the students burst into laughter. If anything, it only establishes the fact that he did not know about the perils of using a pencil in a spacecraft and the Space Pen.

PS: This scene could have been probably inspired by the age-old joke, which probably originated in the Cold war era and continues to circulate via e-mails and SMS’ worldwide, in which the US and Russia (or USSR), in the height of the space race, were developing a pen for use inside spacecraft and during one such meeting between scientists of both the countries, the Americans extolled about the features of a pen with complex functionalities that could write underwater, in zero gravity and other complex environments. When questioned, the bemused Russians replied, “That’s simple, we use a pencil.”

Is it really as simple as it is being made out to be? Did the Americans really miss out on anything?

Chew on these facts first

  • Pencils produce fine particles of lead dust (not to mention pieces of wood) – the perfect ingredient for a conflagration inside an oxygen-rich atmosphere such as a spacecraft
  • These fine particles can also clog certain vital parts of the complex machinery inside, turning the spacecraft into a veritable flying coffin (after the MiG aircraft, of course)

Now here’s a trivia bit that would astound even Derek O’ Brien...

Developed by an American researcher in private, who had to undergo a harrowing time before his invention was accepted by NASA (who were also researching on similar lines at that time), the Space Pen comprises pressurised nitrogen cartridges that ensure smooth writing by pumping out ink at a constant rate, no matter what the external atmosphere is.

John Fisher was the name of this whacky inventor.

Legend has it, as in any other fairytale, NASA, and later the Russians, were hooked on to this invention, and the Space Pen became associated with tales of invention folklore.

Comments

  1. This explanation is not completely ignored in the movie. In a later scene, the professor comes back and explains these very reasons to the students. So, the director wasn't completely and 'idiot'! :P

    ReplyDelete
  2. yup, karthi, you are bang on target...however, you must remember that this scene effectively deflates rancho's aura of genius

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Is what you are watching actually a cartoon?

Disclaimer: What you are about to read may seem weird, but what the hell, I am hypothesising it to be true, so who knows... Cartoons are basica lly meant for kids. The main reason e lders prefer letting the kids watch them without their sup ervision is that they need not fret over the incidence of X-rated content in it – namely content that concerns that famous three-letter word or violence. I suggest that we re-examine this mindset of ours (as someone who has grown up watching the very cartoons that I am about to damn, I have mixed feelings as I type this. Consider the following list: Tom and Jerry , Bugs Bunny and El mer Fudd/Yosemite Sam , Tweety and Sylvester and Coyote a nd Road R unner . These are cartoons which we would definitel y not squirm about before letting a toddler/child watch it. These cartoons are hilarious, have palatable themes; have caricatures that look cute (I am yet to come across a girl who hates Tweety). Tom and Jerry, for instance, was once even vot...

Why the editorial is the unsung hero of any newspaper

A tad autobiographical, this account encapsulates my experiences at a news organisation. Why wait until 50 or 60 to compose one? Hell, who knows, this could even be its blueprint! So, here goes my first stab at chronicling myself... I was prepared for all kinds of weird questions for my first job interview as a journalist four years ago, for the post of a sub-editor, but I never anticipated this one that caught me off guard. Noting that I preferred to work in the editorial than the reporting section, a HR representative at the organization asked in almost an air of dismissal, implying that the editorial is something redundant, “After all, we have Microsoft Word, in built with grammar and spell check capabilities, so why must I hire you?” I stared at him blankly for a moment as a smile grew on his face, perhaps out of exult at having stumped me. I trotted a familiar refrain, which I am sure he would have encountered countless times, “Because I am passionate about writing a...

Is Thuglak’s Editor Going the Thuglak Way?

The front-page cartoons of this magazine have always been considered a barometer of the nation, and particularly Tamil Nadu’s, political landscape. Rib-tickling and dripping with sarcasm, it’s following has gradually swelled, though, not in dramatic terms, as certain high-profile media houses would flaunt. Be it the DMK or the AIADMK, the BJP or Congress, the Left or National Conference, its leaders have been the butt of many an acerbic but thought-provoking joke. In fact, it may not sound out of context to liken this publication to the American humour magazine, MAD. Sample this: during the height of Anna Hazare’s high-profile fast against corruption, resulting in hectic parleys between his team of lieutenants and the Parliament, this magazine ran a front page cartoon with Team-A on one side and representatives of the UPA government on the other. Team-A, which remains silent when its demands such as inclusion of the Judiciary and prime minister under the Lokpal Bill’s ambit are met...